Who else, besides ratees, needs to sign the evaluation?

The correct answer indicates that supervisors are required to sign the evaluation in addition to the ratees. In the performance evaluation process, the supervisor plays a crucial role as they provide the necessary insights and assessments of the ratee's performance. Their signature signifies that they have reviewed the evaluation and agree with the information presented, ensuring accountability and accuracy in the evaluation process.

This collaboration between ratees and supervisors helps maintain a balanced perspective on performance, as supervisors have firsthand experience observing the ratee’s work and can offer valuable feedback. Including supervisor input not only strengthens the integrity of the evaluation but also aids in the development and growth of the ratee through constructive feedback.

While commanders may review or have oversight on evaluations, their direct signature is not typically required in the same manner as the supervisor. Peer reviewers can offer insights but do not have the same formal responsibility in the signing process as supervisors do. Thus, recognizing the critical role that supervisors play in the evaluation process underscores the importance of their signature in affirming the validity of the performance assessment.